Source |
For today, let's focus on the very general story structure.
In keeping with my 9-Point Story Structure, its important to know your ending in order to craft your beginning. Especially with mystery and crime, it's important to know whodunit, because that's the whole point of this genre, and you must be able to work up to it.
So, the first thing to decide is what kind of mystery story you want to write. When it comes to revealing your ultimate culprit, there are three major story types:
1) Those where the killer is a complete surprise to everyone
2) Those where the killer is one of a finite number of characters
3) Those where the audience knows the killer then entire time, but the other characters in the book do not.
1) Those where the killer is a complete surprise to everyone
Source |
Pros: of this kind of story: Very realistic. Most of the time, the cops aren't "buddies" with the killer and shocked when they finally catch him. He's just another scrum bag to be gotten off the streets.
Cons: It's hard to do a "twist" ending or shocking reveal, because you haven't established any prior link to any of your main characters. One way to avoid this con is to give the killer an accomplice that IS linked to one of your main characters, but be careful with this technique. It can come off as a little to convenient at times, and is used often by crime/mystery writers.
2) Those where the killer is one of a finite number of characters
Source |
An alternate version is where a character the audience has come to know and love ends up (shocker!) being the bad guy.
Pros: This will definitely keep the audience reading. If they get to the point where they know it's either A or B, they're going to be very invested at that point in finding out the answer.
Cons: You won't wow your audience with this format. There's no shock, no twist. This can even be very predictable. It can still be a great story if you can come up with great motives, but we'll talk more about those in later posts.
Those where the audience knows the killer then entire time, but the other characters in the book do not.
Source |
Pros: You generally end up with a much more 3-D bad guy because you aren't hiding his or her identity. You can get in the villain's head, and even create suspense by having them follow the investigation and perhaps threaten your main characters who are involved in the investigation.
Cons: It does take away some of the mystery to know whodunit from the get-go. I actually don't prefer this format because one thing I love about mysteries is the not knowing, and being able to slowly unravel hints until the big reveal. This format does away with all of that.
So, which is best? It just depends on your story. Every one is different. Consider what you wish to accomplish, what you wish your readers to know and when, and which would best serve your story.
Join me next week for Part 2: a more detailed look at crime/mystery story structure!
So, which mystery format do you prefer?
I love a good mystery story every now and again. I never thought about those three techniques but now that I do, I think I've read books that employed each and I have to say, it really depends on the skill in which the author creates the story. Hmmm.. Good post. Going to have to think on this a bit now.
ReplyDeleteI heard once that the perfect mystery has half the audience knowing the answer and the other half wondering. Just enough clues so it makes sense, but not enough to figure it out.
ReplyDelete